On the evening of January 10, Beijing, the 28th round of the CBA schedule started the battle Shenzhen team, the two teams were very popular, but in the last moment, there was an extremely controversial penalty. What is going on?
Beijing has a very controversial penalty in the competition in the battle in Beijing, and it is a penalty that directly determines the results of the game, and eventually triggered a number of players and coaches of Beijing men’s basketball team, and the dispute violation occurred in Section 47 seconds. Shenzhen team foreign aid wrapped in the shot and defended his bodies after Liu Xiaoyu in the ground. When the value of the CPC did not make a penalty in the first time, when most people believe that the game will enter the overtime game, the referee group will determine Liu Xiaoyu’s illegal foul by watching the video playback. The Shenzhen team will ultimately rely on Bick’s serve. 95 Winning than 92.
However, Yang Maojin, the CBA’s referee, believes that when the value of the Value, there is no problem, and whenever the controversial sentences in the CBA areas, the CBA Alliance Referee Office will organize the referee expert group to reconside, in 7 expert groups Among the members, 5 believe that this is a violation of violations, and 2 is considered to be a general foul. According to a few principles from the majority, the expert group determines that the penalty and processing of the value referee is correct.
